All forumsPortrait and People PhotographyChange forum
Started Jan 8, 2013 | Discussions
| Threaded view |
001FJ • Regular Member • Posts: 361
Wedding photography: glossy vs matte?
Jan 8, 2013
I need help with printing wedding photos. Please note I am not a professional or a wedding photographer so bear up with me. I am just an amateur photographer who has been assigned by my aunt to print her wedding photos and I am doing that for her as a favour.
I live in Toronto, Canada so I went to Black'sand printed few photos as a sample and I really liked the colour reproduction, price (17 cents per print for 4x6, 5x7, or 6x8), and resolution/details. I printed some photos on glossy paper and some on matte paper (Black's printing software call it "normal" but I am guessing normal means "matte".)
I asked the Black's staff there and he said glossy is recommended for weddings, and I also liked the glossy prints because it does not show the textures of the paper as the matte does. I asked my uncle and a friend, who both have experience as wedding photographers, and they said matte paper is better for wedding photos because it is not as reflective as glossy paper and does not leave finger prints on the paper as glossy does, and over all it looks better.(I am putting the photos in an album so I am guessing the images will be reflective anyway because of the plastic sheets covering the photos. And this prevents finger smudges.)
I guess there is no right and wrong answer here, but I just want to know personal opinions on what is preferred: matte or glossy for wedding photos put in an album?
Thanks a lot and I am looking forward to your helpful replies.
Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain
Petruska • Veteran Member • Posts: 9,398
Re: Wedding photography: glossy vs matte?
In reply to 001FJ • Jan 9, 2013
001FJ wrote:
I guess there is no right and wrong answer here, but I just want to know personal opinions on what is preferred: matte or glossy for wedding photos put in an album?
Thanks a lot and I am looking forward to your helpful replies.
I prefer neither glossy or matte.
Most weddding albums that I do and have seen over the years are done with luster or satin papers. 98% of my albums are satin.
Bob P.
Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
Suntan • Veteran Member • Posts: 6,526
Re: Wedding photography: glossy vs matte?
In reply to 001FJ • Jan 9, 2013
Personally, I print all portraits and the like on luster paper. Glossy and Matte are too extreme in each direction.
That said, I would think the obvious answer would be to...drum-roll... ask your aunt. They're her pictures, why wouldn't you ask her what she prefers? And if she says they both look fine, well then, either will work.
Finally, I'm sure your aunt has copyright authority to make prints of these wedding pictures? Right?
-Suntan
Suntan's gear list:Suntan's gear list
Panasonic LX100 Nikon D70 Nikon D300 Nikon D750 Nikon Z9
Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
kgbruce01 • Senior Member • Posts: 1,245
Order samples - have Aunt decide
In reply to 001FJ • Jan 9, 2013
001FJ wrote:
I need help with printing wedding photos. Please note I am not a professional or a wedding photographer so bear up with me. I am just an amateur photographer who has been assigned by my aunt to print her wedding photos and I am doing that for her as a favour.
I live in Toronto, Canada so I went to Black's and printed few photos as a sample and I really liked the colour reproduction, price (17 cents per print for 4x6, 5x7, or 6x8), and resolution/details. I printed some photos on glossy paper and some on matte paper (Black's printing software call it "normal" but I am guessing normal means "matte".)
I asked the Black's staff there and he said glossy is recommended for weddings, and I also liked the glossy prints because it does not show the textures of the paper as the matte does. I asked my uncle and a friend, who both have experience as wedding photographers, and they said matte paper is better for wedding photos because it is not as reflective as glossy paper and does not leave finger prints on the paper as glossy does, and over all it looks better. (I am putting the photos in an album so I am guessing the images will be reflective anyway because of the plastic sheets covering the photos. And this prevents finger smudges.)
I guess there is no right and wrong answer here, but I just want to know personal opinions on what is preferred: matte or glossy for wedding photos put in an album?
Thanks a lot and I am looking forward to your helpful replies.
... wouldn't that be the best idea?
Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
OP 001FJ • Regular Member • Posts: 361
Re: Thank you for the replies.
In reply to kgbruce01 • Jan 11, 2013
The thing is that my aunt lives in another city (4 hrs away) and she asked me to print the photos because the photographer (my uncle) was too busy with personal matters to print them for her. He is not a professional wedding photographer yet, but he does photograph weddings if asked by family and friends. He has a website but he doesn't do photography for a living...yet. He told me that he would print them in matte if he had time, and now it looks like I am going with matte too.
I printed samples and liked matte too but hated the the fact I can see the paper texture (paper fibers?) in the matte. I couldn't see that in the glossy and that's why I asked you.
Thank you for your replies. I learned something new! I had never heard of satin paper before. I am actually going to read about it more now.
Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain
| Threaded view |
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum MMy threads
Latest sample galleries
Sony a9 III sample gallery
Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm F4-7.1 Macro OIS sample gallery
Leica SL3 preview sample gallery
Sony FE 24-50mm F2.8 G sample gallery
See more galleries »
Latest in-depth reviews
311
Leica SL3 initial review
preview1 week ago
The fourth camera in Leica's SL series of full-frame mirrorless cameras sees the 60MP BSI sensor from the Q3 and M11 models arrive with a significant interface redesign.
543
Fujifilm X100VI initial review
preview1 month ago
The Fujifilm X100VI is the sixth iteration of Fujifilm's classically-styled large sensor compact. A 40MP X-Trans sensor, in-body stabilization and 6.2K video are among the updates.
1612
Nikon Zf review: updated with video reel and impressions
review1 month ago
The Nikon Zf is a 24MP full-frame mirrorless camera with classic looks that brings significant improvements to Nikon's mid-price cameras. We just shot a sample reel to get a better feel for its video features and have added our impressions to the review.
221
Megadap ETZ21 Pro review: A Sony-to-Nikon mirrorless lens adapter with impressive autofocus performance
accessory review1 month ago
This $250 electronic lens adapter is perfect for Nikon Z-mount curious Sony shooters — shhh, we won’t tell anyone.
92
Sony ZV-1 Mark II review, a vlogging camera with excellent video that thrives in auto modes
reviewJan 31, 2024
Sony updates the ZV-1, giving the vlog-centric compact camera a 18-50mm equivalent F1.8-4.0 lens that's now wide enough for less cramped selfie mode videos.
Read more reviews »
Latest buying guides
The best cameras around $2000
6 days ago
What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.
New: 7 Best cameras for travel
1 week ago
What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
The 7 Best compact zoom cameras
Nov 23, 2023
If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.
7 Best mirrorless cameras
Nov 17, 2023
'What's the best mirrorless camera?' We're glad you asked.
6 Best high-end cameras
Nov 13, 2023
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
Check out more buying guides »